Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit silversnowe's column >>

SILVERSNOWE

Articles Posted: 21  Links Seeded: 138
Member Since: 10/2007  Last Seen: 4/05/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

It really bugs me when Americans claim that Britain's healthcare is "substandard"

Wed Jul 8, 2009 10:35 AM EDT
politics, healthcare
By silversnowe
Advertise | AdChoices

OK it was substandard circa 1995 - the Conservative government had starved it of cash in the hopes that people would get so tired of waiting for operations they would switch to private healthcare (they were hoping to create a US style system here). Some people did take out private plans only to find they covered only minor stuff and excluded all the chronic stuff that you really need a healthcare system to deal with. So people then switched the government, and money was pumped into the system.

It's now 2009 and things are very different. Here are some stats to show why Britain's health system outperforms the American systems:

1. Infant mortality: number of deaths per 1000 live births

    Sweden 2.75
    Japan     2.79
    France   3.33
    Germany 3.99
    Spain 4.21
    Australia 4.75
    UK  4.85
    Canada 5.04
    Ireland 5.05
    Cuba  5.82
    USA 6.26
    

As you can see, all the countries with socialised healthcare save babies better than the USA.

2. Life expectancy. This is directly correlated to access to good quality healthcare. Put bluntly, those those don't have access to good doctors die before they have to. If loads of people in a given country don't have access to good medicine, the average life expectancy rates drop.

    Japan  82.2 years
    France 80.87 years
    Sweden 80.63 years
    Australia 80.62 years
    Canada 80.4 years
    Spain 80.1 years
    Germany 79.75 years
    UK  79.7 years
    Ireland 78.9 years
    Chile 78.36 years
    Cuba 78.26 years
    USA 78.21 years
   

Much of the criticism of the UK in the American press is around alleged failures in treating cancer in the UK. But clearly the USA ain't saving sufficient cancer patients to prolong life!

3. How much heathcare costs as a % of GDP - the following figures are from the OECD

   UK 8% of GDP
   France 9.5% of GDP
   Canada 9.7% of GDP
   Germany 10.7% of GDP
   Switzerland 10.9% of GDP
   USA 17% of GDP.
  

You are paying how much? And your babies are still dying? You've been robbed. Even more scary is the fact that the US government spends 8% of GDP on Medicare, which only covers retired people. But the UK makes the same amount cover the entire nation from cradle to grave and delivers better outcomes. Plus business in the UK isn't burdened with healthcare costs, and individuals don't go bankrupt just because someone in the family is ill.

That's why the UK has lower unemployment rates than the USA and lower bankruptcies (UK unemployment stands at 7.2% of the workforce, in the USA it's 9.5%). Bankruptcies in the UK are running at 107,000 per annum out of a population of 62 million i.e. 0.17%, in the USA bankruptcies are running at 1.2 million per annum out of a population of 300 million i.e. 4%. In other words you have nearly 23 times the number of bankruptcies in the USA compared to the UK, and all because you don't have a proper socialised healthcare system.

Still think your system is better than ours?

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • silversnowe's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (1)
Rick-1209081

If your numbers are correct, 1.2 million bankruptcies out of 300 million people is 0.4%, not 4%. Therefore we only have about 2.4 times more than the UK.

    Reply#1 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:52 AM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com